OSBORN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

52

18%

LEVEL 3

149

51%

LEVEL 4

74

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

139

51%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

75

51%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

64

50%

LEVEL 4

40

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

74

51%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

75

53%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

19

54%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

123

53%

LEVEL 4

57

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

108

53%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

147

53%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

39

16%

LEVEL 3

134

55%

LEVEL 4

68

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

221
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

147

51%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

199
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

132

51%

LEVEL 4

67

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

50

17%

LEVEL 3

146

51%

LEVEL 4

73

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

138

53%

LEVEL 4

66

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.