PELHAM UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

846
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,216

LEVEL 1

99

8%

LEVEL 2

271

22%

LEVEL 3

497

41%

LEVEL 4

349

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

853
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,193

LEVEL 1

87

7%

LEVEL 2

253

21%

LEVEL 3

491

41%

LEVEL 4

362

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

454
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

106

18%

LEVEL 3

239

41%

LEVEL 4

215

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

430
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

102

18%

LEVEL 3

213

38%

LEVEL 4

217

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

392
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

72

11%

LEVEL 2

165

26%

LEVEL 3

258

41%

LEVEL 4

134

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

423
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

56

9%

LEVEL 2

151

24%

LEVEL 3

278

44%

LEVEL 4

145

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

64
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

32

41%

LEVEL 4

32

41%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

61
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

35

44%

LEVEL 4

26

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

598
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 828

LEVEL 1

54

7%

LEVEL 2

176

21%

LEVEL 3

344

42%

LEVEL 4

254

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

602
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

42

5%

LEVEL 2

143

18%

LEVEL 3

339

43%

LEVEL 4

263

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

20

28%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

66

38%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

110
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

819
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,106

LEVEL 1

51

5%

LEVEL 2

236

21%

LEVEL 3

474

43%

LEVEL 4

345

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

825
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,088

LEVEL 1

42

4%

LEVEL 2

221

20%

LEVEL 3

469

43%

LEVEL 4

356

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

48

44%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

45

43%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

845
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,210

LEVEL 1

96

8%

LEVEL 2

269

22%

LEVEL 3

496

41%

LEVEL 4

349

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

853
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,186

LEVEL 1

82

7%

LEVEL 2

251

21%

LEVEL 3

491

41%

LEVEL 4

362

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

799
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,109

LEVEL 1

73

7%

LEVEL 2

237

21%

LEVEL 3

463

42%

LEVEL 4

336

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

808
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,082

LEVEL 1

60

6%

LEVEL 2

214

20%

LEVEL 3

459

42%

LEVEL 4

349

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

27

24%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.