RYE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,068
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,409

LEVEL 1

86

6%

LEVEL 2

255

18%

LEVEL 3

619

44%

LEVEL 4

449

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,062
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,359

LEVEL 1

78

6%

LEVEL 2

219

16%

LEVEL 3

593

44%

LEVEL 4

469

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

562
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

27

4%

LEVEL 2

93

14%

LEVEL 3

298

44%

LEVEL 4

264

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

526
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

87

14%

LEVEL 3

269

42%

LEVEL 4

257

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

506
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

59

8%

LEVEL 2

162

22%

LEVEL 3

321

44%

LEVEL 4

185

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

536
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 723

LEVEL 1

55

8%

LEVEL 2

132

18%

LEVEL 3

324

45%

LEVEL 4

212

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

10

37%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

77
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

45

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

89
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

40

36%

LEVEL 4

49

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

912
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,184

LEVEL 1

64

5%

LEVEL 2

208

18%

LEVEL 3

539

46%

LEVEL 4

373

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

893
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,126

LEVEL 1

54

5%

LEVEL 2

179

16%

LEVEL 3

507

45%

LEVEL 4

386

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

35

41%

LEVEL 4

23

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

33

42%

LEVEL 4

21

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,045
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,315

LEVEL 1

45

3%

LEVEL 2

225

17%

LEVEL 3

599

46%

LEVEL 4

446

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,031
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,256

LEVEL 1

40

3%

LEVEL 2

185

15%

LEVEL 3

565

45%

LEVEL 4

466

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

41

44%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

38

37%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,062
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,384

LEVEL 1

77

6%

LEVEL 2

245

18%

LEVEL 3

613

44%

LEVEL 4

449

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,052
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,327

LEVEL 1

66

5%

LEVEL 2

209

16%

LEVEL 3

585

44%

LEVEL 4

467

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,054
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,377

LEVEL 1

77

6%

LEVEL 2

246

18%

LEVEL 3

609

44%

LEVEL 4

445

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,049
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,325

LEVEL 1

68

5%

LEVEL 2

208

16%

LEVEL 3

586

44%

LEVEL 4

463

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.