PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

447
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

53

9%

LEVEL 2

115

19%

LEVEL 3

204

33%

LEVEL 4

243

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

427
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

125

21%

LEVEL 3

182

30%

LEVEL 4

245

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

245
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

149

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

142

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

202
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

94

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

206
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

103

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

38
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

24

59%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

19

53%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

19

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

19

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

314
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

81

19%

LEVEL 3

144

34%

LEVEL 4

170

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

305
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

76

19%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

177

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

25

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

26

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

435
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

96

17%

LEVEL 3

194

35%

LEVEL 4

241

43%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

108

20%

LEVEL 3

170

31%

LEVEL 4

239

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

22

39%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

427
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

123

21%

LEVEL 3

182

31%

LEVEL 4

245

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

420
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

100

18%

LEVEL 3

189

34%

LEVEL 4

231

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

404
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

105

19%

LEVEL 3

167

31%

LEVEL 4

237

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.