BRIARCLIFF MANOR UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

408
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

48

8%

LEVEL 2

146

24%

LEVEL 3

243

40%

LEVEL 4

165

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

429
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

31

5%

LEVEL 2

128

22%

LEVEL 3

210

36%

LEVEL 4

219

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

119

45%

LEVEL 4

85

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

101

37%

LEVEL 4

109

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

124

37%

LEVEL 4

80

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

219
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

109

34%

LEVEL 4

110

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

12

46%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

74
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

35

39%

LEVEL 4

39

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

86
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

58

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

284
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

176

41%

LEVEL 4

108

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

148

37%

LEVEL 4

129

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

20

36%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

18

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

402
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

133

23%

LEVEL 3

238

42%

LEVEL 4

164

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

425
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

112

20%

LEVEL 3

208

37%

LEVEL 4

217

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

16

53%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

423
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

127

22%

LEVEL 3

207

36%

LEVEL 4

216

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.