ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

104

18%

LEVEL 2

156

27%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

173

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

122

21%

LEVEL 2

141

24%

LEVEL 3

170

30%

LEVEL 4

143

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

95

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

77

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

27

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

89

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

83

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

139

26%

LEVEL 3

141

27%

LEVEL 4

173

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

89

17%

LEVEL 2

123

24%

LEVEL 3

165

32%

LEVEL 4

142

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

29

51%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

33

58%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

325
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

88

16%

LEVEL 2

151

27%

LEVEL 3

152

27%

LEVEL 4

173

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

313
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

109

20%

LEVEL 2

134

24%

LEVEL 3

170

31%

LEVEL 4

143

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

16

76%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

274
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

95

23%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

155

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

266
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

58

14%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

126

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

324
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

101

18%

LEVEL 2

152

26%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

172

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.