Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT E BELL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

452
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

94

17%

LEVEL 3

203

36%

LEVEL 4

249

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

438
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

101

18%

LEVEL 3

189

33%

LEVEL 4

249

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

255
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

23

8%

LEVEL 3

104

37%

LEVEL 4

151

54%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

227
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

36

13%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

150

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

197
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

98

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

211
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

112

37%

LEVEL 4

99

33%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

10

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

68
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

52

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

50

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

333
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

81

19%

LEVEL 3

163

38%

LEVEL 4

170

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

320
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

78

18%

LEVEL 3

146

34%

LEVEL 4

174

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

14

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

433
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

75

14%

LEVEL 3

191

37%

LEVEL 4

242

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

419
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

78

15%

LEVEL 3

174

33%

LEVEL 4

245

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

15

26%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

435
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

89

16%

LEVEL 3

193

35%

LEVEL 4

242

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

416
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

96

18%

LEVEL 3

181

33%

LEVEL 4

235

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

14

48%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.