CHAPPAQUA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,359
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,669

LEVEL 1

60

4%

LEVEL 2

250

15%

LEVEL 3

689

41%

LEVEL 4

670

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,304
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,641

LEVEL 1

77

5%

LEVEL 2

260

16%

LEVEL 3

629

38%

LEVEL 4

675

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

694
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

16

2%

LEVEL 2

77

10%

LEVEL 3

323

41%

LEVEL 4

371

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

655
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 781

LEVEL 1

26

3%

LEVEL 2

100

13%

LEVEL 3

270

35%

LEVEL 4

385

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

665
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 882

LEVEL 1

44

5%

LEVEL 2

173

20%

LEVEL 3

366

41%

LEVEL 4

299

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

649
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 860

LEVEL 1

51

6%

LEVEL 2

160

19%

LEVEL 3

359

42%

LEVEL 4

290

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

60
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

27

38%

LEVEL 4

33

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

53
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

23

36%

LEVEL 4

30

47%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

215
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

144

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

212
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

142

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,002
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,247

LEVEL 1

38

3%

LEVEL 2

207

17%

LEVEL 3

546

44%

LEVEL 4

456

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

961
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,225

LEVEL 1

59

5%

LEVEL 2

205

17%

LEVEL 3

498

41%

LEVEL 4

463

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

37

36%

LEVEL 4

34

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

35

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,313
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,534

LEVEL 1

22

1%

LEVEL 2

199

13%

LEVEL 3

657

43%

LEVEL 4

656

43%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,257
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,505

LEVEL 1

39

3%

LEVEL 2

209

14%

LEVEL 3

591

39%

LEVEL 4

666

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,357
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,655

LEVEL 1

54

3%

LEVEL 2

244

15%

LEVEL 3

687

42%

LEVEL 4

670

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,299
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,624

LEVEL 1

72

4%

LEVEL 2

253

16%

LEVEL 3

625

38%

LEVEL 4

674

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,319
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,604

LEVEL 1

52

3%

LEVEL 2

233

15%

LEVEL 3

666

42%

LEVEL 4

653

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,259
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,574

LEVEL 1

67

4%

LEVEL 2

248

16%

LEVEL 3

605

38%

LEVEL 4

654

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

17

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

21

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.