BENJAMIN TURNER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

155

31%

LEVEL 2

194

39%

LEVEL 3

108

22%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

183

54%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

66

46%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

105

43%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

117

59%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

118
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

127

30%

LEVEL 2

176

42%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

144

54%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

29

53%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

176

44%

LEVEL 3

103

26%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

89

38%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

79

77%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

94

90%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

151
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

135

28%

LEVEL 2

189

40%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

158

50%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

20

80%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

25

93%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

15

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

146

33%

LEVEL 2

175

40%

LEVEL 3

87

20%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

158

56%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

135

30%

LEVEL 2

177

39%

LEVEL 3

101

22%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

163

54%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.