VALHALLA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

70

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

25

20%

LEVEL 3

55

44%

LEVEL 4

35

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

37

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

15

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

60%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

15

25%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

23

28%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

16

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

94

39%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

70

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

151
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

61

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

65

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

23

44%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.