Skip to Content
Main content

KENSICO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

113

39%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

64

44%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

55

37%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

60

42%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

57

37%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

23

26%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

42

47%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

112

45%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

104

38%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

17

53%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

141
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

113

41%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

108

37%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

96

43%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

30

47%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.