COLUMBUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

179

45%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

72

39%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

82

46%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

97

44%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

112

37%

LEVEL 3

104

35%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

141

47%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

21

37%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

131

39%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

90

26%

LEVEL 3

176

50%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

22

49%

LEVEL 2

20

44%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

196
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

233
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

177

46%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

225
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

170

47%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.