CHATSWORTH AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

36

11%

LEVEL 3

147

44%

LEVEL 4

141

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

142

42%

LEVEL 4

153

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

80

48%

LEVEL 4

76

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

84

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

65

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

81

47%

LEVEL 4

69

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

243
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

26

9%

LEVEL 3

120

44%

LEVEL 4

123

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

243
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

128

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

13

46%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

16

48%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

137

43%

LEVEL 4

139

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

134

43%

LEVEL 4

151

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

288
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

147

45%

LEVEL 4

141

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

138

44%

LEVEL 4

139

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

284
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

133

42%

LEVEL 4

151

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

9

53%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.