RICHARD J BAILEY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

115

29%

LEVEL 2

141

35%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

123

33%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

72

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

17

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

15

32%

LEVEL 4

21

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

57

42%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

53

34%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

68

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

79

25%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

52

71%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

44

79%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

146
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

68

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

151
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

103

31%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

72

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

21

62%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

39

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

98

39%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

101

39%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

119

33%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.