Skip to Content
Main content

ARDSLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

121

22%

LEVEL 3

205

37%

LEVEL 4

162

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

117

20%

LEVEL 3

200

35%

LEVEL 4

221

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

84

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

208
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

92

35%

LEVEL 4

116

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

195
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

213
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

105

33%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

10

59%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

13

54%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

111
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

61

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

113
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

70

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

114

38%

LEVEL 4

81

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

113

37%

LEVEL 4

108

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

13

54%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

26

38%

LEVEL 4

16

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

29

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

104

21%

LEVEL 3

195

39%

LEVEL 4

161

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

103

19%

LEVEL 3

194

36%

LEVEL 4

215

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

24

46%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

366
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

54

10%

LEVEL 2

118

22%

LEVEL 3

204

38%

LEVEL 4

162

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

358
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

51

10%

LEVEL 2

105

20%

LEVEL 3

199

39%

LEVEL 4

159

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

401
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

103

19%

LEVEL 3

188

35%

LEVEL 4

213

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.