HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

412
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

94

17%

LEVEL 3

243

45%

LEVEL 4

169

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

441
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

126

21%

LEVEL 3

255

42%

LEVEL 4

186

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

219
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

40

15%

LEVEL 3

121

45%

LEVEL 4

98

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

256
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

57

18%

LEVEL 3

139

43%

LEVEL 4

117

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

193
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

54

20%

LEVEL 3

122

44%

LEVEL 4

71

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

116

41%

LEVEL 4

69

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

18

47%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

36
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

18

42%

LEVEL 4

18

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

316
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

65

16%

LEVEL 3

187

47%

LEVEL 4

129

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

337
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

86

19%

LEVEL 3

191

43%

LEVEL 4

146

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

32

42%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

78

16%

LEVEL 3

229

46%

LEVEL 4

169

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

422
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

101

18%

LEVEL 3

241

44%

LEVEL 4

181

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

21

41%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

15

25%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

441
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

121

20%

LEVEL 3

255

43%

LEVEL 4

186

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

405
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

87

17%

LEVEL 3

237

45%

LEVEL 4

168

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

434
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

116

20%

LEVEL 3

250

43%

LEVEL 4

184

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.