Skip to Content
Main content

IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

70

20%

LEVEL 3

130

37%

LEVEL 4

129

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

52

14%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

163

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

66

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

86

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

66

37%

LEVEL 4

63

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

77

43%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

17

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

28

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

99

38%

LEVEL 4

100

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

117

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

17

47%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

126

39%

LEVEL 4

126

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

43

13%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

160

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

60

18%

LEVEL 3

126

38%

LEVEL 4

126

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

268
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

48

14%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

160

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.