Skip to Content
Main content

IRVINGTON UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

542
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

43

6%

LEVEL 2

164

22%

LEVEL 3

334

45%

LEVEL 4

208

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

552
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 755

LEVEL 1

60

8%

LEVEL 2

143

19%

LEVEL 3

313

41%

LEVEL 4

239

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

258
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

146

42%

LEVEL 4

112

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

282
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

63

17%

LEVEL 3

151

42%

LEVEL 4

131

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

284
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

95

23%

LEVEL 3

188

46%

LEVEL 4

96

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

270
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

80

20%

LEVEL 3

162

41%

LEVEL 4

108

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

18

41%

LEVEL 4

15

34%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

42
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

26

51%

LEVEL 4

16

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

41

45%

LEVEL 4

32

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

42

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

384
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

114

22%

LEVEL 3

235

45%

LEVEL 4

149

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

377
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

97

19%

LEVEL 3

212

42%

LEVEL 4

165

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

32

46%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

38

48%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

527
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 685

LEVEL 1

20

3%

LEVEL 2

138

20%

LEVEL 3

323

47%

LEVEL 4

204

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

540
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 687

LEVEL 1

29

4%

LEVEL 2

118

17%

LEVEL 3

305

44%

LEVEL 4

235

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

23

36%

LEVEL 2

26

41%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

31

46%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

542
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 743

LEVEL 1

39

5%

LEVEL 2

162

22%

LEVEL 3

334

45%

LEVEL 4

208

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

552
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

50

7%

LEVEL 2

140

19%

LEVEL 3

313

42%

LEVEL 4

239

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

522
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

31

4%

LEVEL 2

138

20%

LEVEL 3

318

46%

LEVEL 4

204

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

524
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

43

6%

LEVEL 2

123

18%

LEVEL 3

292

42%

LEVEL 4

232

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

26

45%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

17

26%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.