Skip to Content
Main content

TUCKAHOE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

118

27%

LEVEL 3

166

37%

LEVEL 4

114

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

115

24%

LEVEL 3

182

38%

LEVEL 4

131

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

87

40%

LEVEL 4

65

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

93

39%

LEVEL 4

80

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

89

38%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

16

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

18

44%

LEVEL 4

14

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

124

40%

LEVEL 4

79

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

126

39%

LEVEL 4

96

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

20

35%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

162

40%

LEVEL 4

114

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

100

23%

LEVEL 3

179

41%

LEVEL 4

130

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

276
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

112

26%

LEVEL 3

162

38%

LEVEL 4

114

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

311
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

110

24%

LEVEL 3

180

39%

LEVEL 4

131

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

143

39%

LEVEL 4

107

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

290
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

90

22%

LEVEL 3

164

40%

LEVEL 4

126

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

23

31%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.