WILLIAM E COTTLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

105

42%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

114

44%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

56

47%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

60

44%

LEVEL 4

32

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

49

38%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

54

45%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

12

55%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

79

45%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

79

43%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

103

45%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

112

47%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

101

43%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

114

46%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

89

43%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

100

46%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.