ANNE HUTCHINSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

139

47%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

165

53%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

69

50%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

80

56%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

70

44%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

85

51%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

23

49%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

21

48%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

84

48%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

112

57%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

22

41%

LEVEL 3

24

44%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

132

51%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

156

58%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

18

49%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

13

32%

LEVEL 2

18

44%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

162
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

139

49%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

195
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

72

25%

LEVEL 3

156

54%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

163

53%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.