Skip to Content
Main content

CARRIE E TOMPKINS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

53

21%

LEVEL 3

120

48%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

113

51%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

65

54%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

51

50%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

55

43%

LEVEL 4

24

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

62

52%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

14

67%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

95

56%

LEVEL 4

40

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

85

54%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

113

52%

LEVEL 4

54

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

107

57%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

119

50%

LEVEL 4

57

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

111

52%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

116

51%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

110

54%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.