KATONAH-LEWISBORO UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

873
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,182

LEVEL 1

60

5%

LEVEL 2

249

21%

LEVEL 3

521

44%

LEVEL 4

352

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

891
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,174

LEVEL 1

75

6%

LEVEL 2

208

18%

LEVEL 3

482

41%

LEVEL 4

409

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

468
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

106

18%

LEVEL 3

261

44%

LEVEL 4

207

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

472
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

79

14%

LEVEL 3

231

41%

LEVEL 4

241

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

405
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

143

24%

LEVEL 3

260

44%

LEVEL 4

145

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

419
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

58

10%

LEVEL 2

129

21%

LEVEL 3

251

41%

LEVEL 4

168

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

47
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

57
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

34

52%

LEVEL 4

23

35%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

15

45%

LEVEL 4

12

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

17

44%

LEVEL 4

15

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

717
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 968

LEVEL 1

41

4%

LEVEL 2

210

22%

LEVEL 3

427

44%

LEVEL 4

290

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

724
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 947

LEVEL 1

58

6%

LEVEL 2

165

17%

LEVEL 3

395

42%

LEVEL 4

329

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

46

43%

LEVEL 4

28

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

34

31%

LEVEL 4

37

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

818
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 996

LEVEL 1

18

2%

LEVEL 2

160

16%

LEVEL 3

478

48%

LEVEL 4

340

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

841
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,002

LEVEL 1

23

2%

LEVEL 2

138

14%

LEVEL 3

444

44%

LEVEL 4

397

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

55
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

89

48%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

826
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,110

LEVEL 1

50

5%

LEVEL 2

234

21%

LEVEL 3

487

44%

LEVEL 4

339

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

851
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,113

LEVEL 1

69

6%

LEVEL 2

193

17%

LEVEL 3

459

41%

LEVEL 4

392

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

34

47%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

17

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.