Skip to Content
Main content

INCREASE MILLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

112

49%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

122

51%

LEVEL 4

64

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

58

53%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

56

47%

LEVEL 4

48

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

54

45%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

66

55%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

10

77%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

64%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

86

47%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

34

18%

LEVEL 3

93

50%

LEVEL 4

53

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

12

50%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

13

52%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

107

53%

LEVEL 4

45

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

111

52%

LEVEL 4

63

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

16

59%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

105

49%

LEVEL 4

47

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

40

18%

LEVEL 3

117

52%

LEVEL 4

63

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.