GANANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

93

27%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

122

31%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

95

34%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

110

35%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

87

25%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

89

26%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

117

31%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

54

47%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

62

43%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

90

27%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

140
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

121

32%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.