PALMYRA-MACEDON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

203

29%

LEVEL 2

250

36%

LEVEL 3

173

25%

LEVEL 4

68

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

263

38%

LEVEL 2

220

32%

LEVEL 3

154

22%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

104

33%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

128

34%

LEVEL 2

144

38%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

159

43%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

190

30%

LEVEL 2

230

36%

LEVEL 3

157

24%

LEVEL 4

66

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

245

38%

LEVEL 2

205

32%

LEVEL 3

143

22%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

142

24%

LEVEL 2

220

37%

LEVEL 3

170

28%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

198

33%

LEVEL 2

195

33%

LEVEL 3

152

25%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

61

64%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

65

71%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

93

23%

LEVEL 2

138

34%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

111

29%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

110

38%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

152

50%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

207
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

259

38%

LEVEL 2

218

32%

LEVEL 3

154

23%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.