Skip to Content
Main content

LYONS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

189

50%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

50

13%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

182

50%

LEVEL 2

118

32%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

84

48%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

110

55%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

98

52%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

24

53%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

115

46%

LEVEL 2

93

37%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

120

47%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

36

73%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

23

55%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

139

45%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

146

46%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

50

77%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

36

71%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

52

41%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

48

38%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

137

55%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

134

56%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

179

50%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.