CLYDE-SAVANNAH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

122

44%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

133

47%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

58

42%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

82

56%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

75

51%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

100

42%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

115

46%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

84

36%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

94

41%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

39

72%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

118

43%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

42

35%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

45

35%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

80

51%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

88

56%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

111

42%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.