NORMAN R KELLEY INTERMEDIATE SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

211

45%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

229

48%

LEVEL 2

151

32%

LEVEL 3

87

18%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

106

44%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

112

49%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

123

52%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

139

43%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

149

45%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

30

68%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

42

53%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

168

40%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

185

44%

LEVEL 2

140

33%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

43

86%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

44

79%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

52

36%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

169

53%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

177

54%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

207

45%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

216

47%

LEVEL 2

148

32%

LEVEL 3

87

19%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.