HUDSON FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 923

LEVEL 1

257

28%

LEVEL 2

309

33%

LEVEL 3

267

29%

LEVEL 4

90

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 929

LEVEL 1

314

34%

LEVEL 2

329

35%

LEVEL 3

209

22%

LEVEL 4

77

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

95

21%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

152

33%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

141

30%

LEVEL 2

155

33%

LEVEL 3

127

27%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

162

35%

LEVEL 2

150

33%

LEVEL 3

115

25%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

173

38%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

315
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 823

LEVEL 1

229

28%

LEVEL 2

279

34%

LEVEL 3

235

29%

LEVEL 4

80

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

254
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 816

LEVEL 1

279

34%

LEVEL 2

283

35%

LEVEL 3

182

22%

LEVEL 4

72

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

135

18%

LEVEL 2

258

35%

LEVEL 3

254

35%

LEVEL 4

89

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

167

23%

LEVEL 2

288

39%

LEVEL 3

204

28%

LEVEL 4

75

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

122

65%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

147

75%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

89

21%

LEVEL 2

132

31%

LEVEL 3

148

34%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

124

24%

LEVEL 2

185

36%

LEVEL 3

148

29%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

168

34%

LEVEL 2

177

36%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

190

46%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

284
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 923

LEVEL 1

312

34%

LEVEL 2

327

35%

LEVEL 3

208

23%

LEVEL 4

76

8%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

356
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 906

LEVEL 1

247

27%

LEVEL 2

303

33%

LEVEL 3

266

29%

LEVEL 4

90

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

284
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 907

LEVEL 1

299

33%

LEVEL 2

324

36%

LEVEL 3

208

23%

LEVEL 4

76

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

15

68%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.