Skip to Content
Main content

HUDSON FALLS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

143

32%

LEVEL 2

139

31%

LEVEL 3

115

26%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

157

35%

LEVEL 2

150

34%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

65

29%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

94

41%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

92

41%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

130

33%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

103

26%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

141

36%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

82

21%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

60

70%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

68

76%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

63

26%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

96

40%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

94

47%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

137
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

155

35%

LEVEL 2

148

34%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

138
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

154

35%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.