ONTEORA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

57

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

67

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

56

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

21

45%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

57

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

32

68%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

36

69%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

150
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

102

29%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

69

43%

LEVEL 4

42

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

51

36%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

178
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

67

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.