Skip to Content
Main content

MARLBORO MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

98

30%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

62

38%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

65

36%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

27

38%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

37

77%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

43

70%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

127
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

45

41%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

52

42%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

124
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.