RONDOUT VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

187

28%

LEVEL 2

224

34%

LEVEL 3

173

26%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

214

30%

LEVEL 2

232

33%

LEVEL 3

188

26%

LEVEL 4

76

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

70

22%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

100

28%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

117

35%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

114

32%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

154

27%

LEVEL 2

187

33%

LEVEL 3

151

27%

LEVEL 4

72

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

168

28%

LEVEL 2

189

32%

LEVEL 3

169

29%

LEVEL 4

64

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

25

44%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

104

19%

LEVEL 2

190

35%

LEVEL 3

164

30%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

123

22%

LEVEL 2

197

35%

LEVEL 3

176

31%

LEVEL 4

75

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

83

66%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

91

65%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

121

39%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

145

43%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

252
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 659

LEVEL 1

185

28%

LEVEL 2

222

34%

LEVEL 3

172

26%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

264
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

209

30%

LEVEL 2

230

33%

LEVEL 3

188

27%

LEVEL 4

76

11%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

252
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

181

28%

LEVEL 2

222

34%

LEVEL 3

172

26%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

264
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

211

30%

LEVEL 2

229

33%

LEVEL 3

188

27%

LEVEL 4

76

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.