Skip to Content
Main content

HIGHLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

103

25%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

131

31%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

109

24%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

144

32%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

62

30%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

68

29%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

13

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

9

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

17

45%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

26

36%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

25

37%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

61

17%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

128

35%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

144

36%

LEVEL 3

141

35%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

42

81%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

41

76%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

189
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

106

24%

LEVEL 2

151

34%

LEVEL 3

144

32%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

97

37%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

182
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

100

24%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

182
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

97

24%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

188
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

151

34%

LEVEL 3

143

32%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.