Skip to Content
Main content

LANSING MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

90

26%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

64

19%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

96

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

41

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

55

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

72

25%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

79

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

74

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

95

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

26

67%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

66

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

85

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

35

38%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.