DRYDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

202

34%

LEVEL 2

185

31%

LEVEL 3

154

26%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

193

33%

LEVEL 2

215

37%

LEVEL 3

123

21%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

77

27%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

130

40%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

175

34%

LEVEL 2

150

29%

LEVEL 3

144

28%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

164

32%

LEVEL 2

183

36%

LEVEL 3

112

22%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

124

26%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

100

21%

LEVEL 2

192

41%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

52

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

78

70%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

93

79%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

100

38%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

141

48%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

202
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

192

33%

LEVEL 2

180

31%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

176
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

186

32%

LEVEL 2

213

37%

LEVEL 3

123

21%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.