WAVERLY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

249

40%

LEVEL 2

219

35%

LEVEL 3

112

18%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

253

38%

LEVEL 2

227

34%

LEVEL 3

140

21%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

110

36%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

139

44%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

151

43%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

244

41%

LEVEL 2

209

35%

LEVEL 3

107

18%

LEVEL 4

42

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

245

38%

LEVEL 2

215

34%

LEVEL 3

130

20%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

174

33%

LEVEL 2

195

37%

LEVEL 3

110

21%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

187

33%

LEVEL 2

202

35%

LEVEL 3

134

23%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

75

74%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

66

67%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

84

30%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

180

47%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

169

43%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

246

40%

LEVEL 2

219

35%

LEVEL 3

110

18%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.