HAMPTON BAYS UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

171

32%

LEVEL 2

204

38%

LEVEL 3

136

25%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

209

38%

LEVEL 2

176

32%

LEVEL 3

111

20%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

147

46%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

73

41%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

138

40%

LEVEL 2

140

40%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

156

46%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

145

29%

LEVEL 2

191

38%

LEVEL 3

131

26%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

166

34%

LEVEL 2

167

34%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

26

59%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

43

75%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

157

39%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

87

63%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

93

57%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

78

43%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

41

24%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

139

39%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

168

46%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

166
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

166

31%

LEVEL 2

201

38%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

206

39%

LEVEL 2

174

33%

LEVEL 3

110

21%

LEVEL 4

45

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.