KINGS PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

125

23%

LEVEL 3

228

42%

LEVEL 4

144

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

138

24%

LEVEL 3

246

44%

LEVEL 4

139

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

101

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

213
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

118

43%

LEVEL 4

95

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

125

47%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

128

44%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

314
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

198

44%

LEVEL 4

116

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

308
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

115

25%

LEVEL 3

196

43%

LEVEL 4

112

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

21

39%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

35

48%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

98

21%

LEVEL 3

214

45%

LEVEL 4

143

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

368
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

103

21%

LEVEL 3

232

48%

LEVEL 4

136

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

24

32%

LEVEL 2

35

46%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

372
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

124

23%

LEVEL 3

228

43%

LEVEL 4

144

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

384
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

135

24%

LEVEL 3

245

44%

LEVEL 4

139

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

337
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

203

43%

LEVEL 4

134

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

348
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

115

23%

LEVEL 3

223

45%

LEVEL 4

125

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.