ANDREW T MORROW SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

134

33%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

80

42%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

45

35%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

19

33%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

9

22%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

115

31%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

82

34%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

19

49%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

104
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

65

52%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

40

70%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

30

30%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

128

40%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

130

33%

LEVEL 2

154

39%

LEVEL 3

99

25%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

87

33%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.