CORDELLO AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

95

29%

LEVEL 2

142

43%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

74

26%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

72

45%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

44

31%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

15

36%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

126

46%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

128

43%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

93

37%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

98
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

71

37%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

58

44%

LEVEL 2

59

45%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

39

41%

LEVEL 2

42

44%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

22

48%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

42

37%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

120

43%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

91

28%

LEVEL 2

140

44%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

69

25%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.