FRANCIS J O'NEILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

113

26%

LEVEL 2

193

44%

LEVEL 3

114

26%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

113

34%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

90

40%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

103

47%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

75

40%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

23

28%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

28

40%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

150

44%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

83

33%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

166

44%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

27

44%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

44

52%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

126
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

151

44%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

67

27%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

47

47%

LEVEL 2

42

42%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

46

52%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

15

20%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

42

33%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

98

27%

LEVEL 2

164

45%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

84

41%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

181

43%

LEVEL 3

109

26%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

108

34%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.