CHARLES A MULLIGAN ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 781

LEVEL 1

280

36%

LEVEL 2

270

35%

LEVEL 3

159

20%

LEVEL 4

72

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

216

39%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

100

18%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

181

43%

LEVEL 2

134

32%

LEVEL 3

67

16%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

119

42%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

26

34%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

49

34%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

39

48%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

153
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

203

38%

LEVEL 2

185

34%

LEVEL 3

108

20%

LEVEL 4

45

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

117
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

167

38%

LEVEL 2

156

35%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

200

29%

LEVEL 2

257

38%

LEVEL 3

155

23%

LEVEL 4

70

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

174

35%

LEVEL 2

177

35%

LEVEL 3

99

20%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

80

81%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

42

84%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

225
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

147

25%

LEVEL 2

225

38%

LEVEL 3

154

26%

LEVEL 4

71

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

98

27%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

133

72%

LEVEL 2

45

24%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

118

65%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

78

37%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

251

39%

LEVEL 2

219

34%

LEVEL 3

115

18%

LEVEL 4

61

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

138

40%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

226
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

271

36%

LEVEL 2

262

35%

LEVEL 3

154

20%

LEVEL 4

72

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

149
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

207

38%

LEVEL 2

183

34%

LEVEL 3

99

18%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.