LORETTA PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

108

40%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

128

37%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

49

39%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

82

46%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

59

41%

LEVEL 2

65

45%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

67

41%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

11

55%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

98

40%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

117

38%

LEVEL 2

123

40%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

90

38%

LEVEL 2

99

42%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

113

36%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

18

51%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

76

50%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

103

47%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

77

64%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

85

68%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

105

40%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

107

41%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

127

38%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.