Skip to Content
Main content

WEST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

166

53%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

28

43%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

57

47%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

48

45%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

109

56%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

29

63%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

51

44%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

124

56%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

52

37%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

120

48%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

24

80%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

46

72%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

52

36%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

95

40%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

24

89%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

71

91%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

63

45%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

148

54%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

160

52%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.