WEST ISLIP UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

191

33%

LEVEL 3

229

40%

LEVEL 4

89

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

90

16%

LEVEL 2

194

34%

LEVEL 3

221

39%

LEVEL 4

68

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

110

44%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

112

42%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

119

37%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

248
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

149

34%

LEVEL 3

177

40%

LEVEL 4

71

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

169

38%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

31

35%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

168

33%

LEVEL 3

219

43%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

54

11%

LEVEL 2

178

35%

LEVEL 3

212

41%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

36

59%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

317
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

60

11%

LEVEL 2

189

33%

LEVEL 3

228

40%

LEVEL 4

89

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

280
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

158

33%

LEVEL 3

202

42%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

158

33%

LEVEL 3

187

40%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.