Skip to Content
Main content

HENRY L STIMSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

94

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

158

36%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

51

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

100

39%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

58

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

22

54%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

97

48%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

60

19%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

91

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

115

30%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

31

62%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

43

73%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

184
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

94

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

155
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

50

85%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

55

83%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

72

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

78

41%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

123

47%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

183
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

93

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

152
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

152

35%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.