GARDINER MANOR SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

186

47%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

111

25%

LEVEL 2

177

39%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

100

49%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

86

45%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

94

44%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

31

46%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

45

52%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

26

30%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

103

49%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

69

27%

LEVEL 2

108

42%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

160

47%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

83

21%

LEVEL 2

157

39%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

25

46%

LEVEL 2

26

48%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

28

56%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

114
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

163

48%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

154

39%

LEVEL 3

138

35%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

31

55%

LEVEL 2

23

41%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

34

59%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

63

48%

LEVEL 3

45

35%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

62

40%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

123

46%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

88

29%

LEVEL 2

127

42%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

181

47%

LEVEL 3

100

26%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

163
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

108

24%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

137

31%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.