Skip to Content
Main content

COMMACK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

162

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

141

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

88

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

65

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

74

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

76

39%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

41

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

43

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

93

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

80

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

15

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

12

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

94

23%

LEVEL 3

134

33%

LEVEL 4

156

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

141

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

22

54%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

267
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

91

23%

LEVEL 3

116

30%

LEVEL 4

151

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

214
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

126

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

23

40%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

17

34%

LEVEL 4

15

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.